Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 152
Filter
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(5): 2105-2108, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323554

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on compliance to amblyopia therapy from the perspective of parents of amblyopic children. Methods: The participants for the qualitative study were enrolled from the medical records of a tertiary eye care center during the COVID-19 pandemic. The trained researcher conducted telephonic interviews consisting of validated 15 open-ended questions for 15 min. The questions were related to patients' compliance toward amblyopia treatment and the date of follow-up with their practitioners. The data collected were entered on Excel sheets in the participant's own words and later converted to a transcript for analysis. Results: A total of 217 parents of children with amblyopia who were due for follow-up were contacted through telephone. The response rate for willingness to participate was only 36% (n = 78). Of these, 76% (n = 59) of parents reported that their child was compliant toward the treatment during the therapy period and 69% reported that their child was currently not on treatment for amblyopia. Conclusion: In the current study, we have observed that although reported compliance by parents during the therapy period was good, around 69% of patients had discontinued amblyopia therapy. The main reason for the discontinuation of therapy was the failure to visit the hospital during the scheduled follow-up with the eye care practitioner.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , Amblyopia/epidemiology , Amblyopia/therapy , Visual Acuity , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Patient Compliance , Tertiary Care Centers , Sensory Deprivation , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eye Contact Lens ; 49(7): 292-295, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313494

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the choice of intraocular lens (IOL) and sociodemographic characteristics between patients who underwent elective cataract surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the pandemic at the Wilmer Eye Institute. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent cataract surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic (June 1 to November 30, 2019) and during the pandemic (June 1 to November 30, 2020) was conducted. Sociodemographic information, including age, sex, race, and insurance, and choice of IOL (premium or standard) were analyzed. The association between timing of surgery and choice of IOL was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 2,877 patients (3,946 eyes) before COVID-19 and 2,564 patients (3,605 eyes) during COVID-19. However, 9.0% (357/3,946) of surgeries before COVID-19 used premium IOLs compared with 11.1% (399/3,605) during COVID-19 ( P =0.004). There was no difference in the racial characteristics of patients between before and during COVID-19. After adjusting for time of surgery and demographics, the odds of choosing premium IOLs for black patients was 0.32 times the odds for white patients ( P <0.001). There was an increase in private-insured patients but a decrease in Medicare-insured patients during COVID-19. After adjusting for time of surgery and demographics, private-insured patients had higher odds of choosing premium IOLs ( P <0.001), whereas Medicaid-insured patients had lower odds ( P =0.007) when compared with Medicare-insured patients. CONCLUSION: More patients chose premium IOLs during COVID-19 than before COVID-19, concurrent with change in insurance status. White patients were more likely to choose premium IOLs than black patients, as were private-insured patients compared with Medicare-insured patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cataract , Lenses, Intraocular , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Visual Acuity , COVID-19/epidemiology , Medicare
3.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 113, 2023 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vogt‒Koyanagi‒Harada (VKH) disease is a multifactorial systemic autoimmune disorder against melanocytes that is characterized by panuveitis. Familial occurrence of VKH disease is rare. Here, we report two cases of a father and his son with characteristic manifestations of VKH disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old male with typical clinical symptoms of VKH disease was referred to Tangshan Eye Hospital. Examination showed the presence of ciliochoroidal effusion and exudative retinal detachment in both eyes. The patient was given intravenous methylprednisolone 120 mg for 2 days and intravenous methylprednisolone 80 mg for 1 day followed by 48 mg (1 mg/kg/day) oral methylprednisolone daily, accompanied by oral azathioprine 50 mg daily. Cycloplegic agent (0.5% tropicamide three times daily [TID]) was added. The patient was free of symptoms and recurrence within more than 1-year-follow-up period, the best corrected visual acuity (BVCA) was increased and maintained in both eyes with complete resolution of subretinal fluid. One year and nine months later, case 2 (his son) also presented with the typical clinical symptoms of VKH disease at 29 years of age. The son also recovered from VKH disease after routine and standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first VKH disease case report of a father-son relationship. Although genetic factors have been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of VKH disease, the different inheritance modes of VKH patients need to be further explored and studied.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids , Methylprednisolone , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Fathers , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Nuclear Family , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome/diagnosis , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome/drug therapy , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome/complications , Adult , Visual Acuity , Treatment Outcome
4.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 67(3): 255-263, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2254854

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the local alert levels regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the clinical patterns of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in Japan. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, consecutive case series. METHODS: We compared two groups of RRD patients, a COVID-19 pandemic group and a control group. Based on the local alert levels in Nagano, five periods during the COVID-19 pandemic were further analyzed: epidemic 1 (state of emergency), inter-epidemic 1, epidemic 2 (second epidemic duration), inter-epidemic 2, and epidemic 3 (third epidemic duration). Patients' characteristics, including symptoms' duration before visiting our hospital, macula status, and retinal detachment (RD) recurrence rate in each period, were compared with those in a control group. RESULTS: There were 78 patients in the pandemic group and 208 in the control group. The pandemic group had a longer duration of symptoms than the control group (12.0 ± 13.5 days vs. 8.9 ± 14.7 days, P = 0.0045). During the epidemic 1 period, patients had a higher rate of macula-off RRD (71.4% vs. 48.6%) and RD recurrence (28.6% vs. 4.8%) than the control group. This period also demonstrated the highest rates compared to all other periods in the pandemic group. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, RRD patients significantly delayed visiting a surgical facility. They showed a higher rate of macula-off and recurrence compared to the control group during the state of emergency than during other periods of the COVID-19 pandemic, although the difference was not statistically significant due to the small sample size.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Retinal Detachment , Humans , Retinal Detachment/diagnosis , Retinal Detachment/epidemiology , Retinal Detachment/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Follow-Up Studies , Vitrectomy , Visual Acuity , COVID-19/epidemiology
6.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0275611, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287938

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity equivalence of the proposed biosimilar CKD-701 with the reference ranibizumab in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 312 participants with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization were randomly assigned to either the CKD-701 (n = 156) or reference ranibizumab (n = 156) arms. The initial 3-month loading intraocular injections were followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing for 9 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with less than 15-letters of corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss at 3 months visit (one month after last loading injection) compared to the baseline time point. The presence of retinal fluid, and changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed as secondary efficacy outcomes. Immunogenicity and safety were evaluated in both treatment arms. RESULTS: In the CKD-701 arm, 143 (97.95%) patients lost <15 letters in the BCVA at 3 months compared to 143 (98.62%) in the reference arm (P = 0.67). The BCVA improved with a mean improvement of +7.0 (CKD-701) and +6.2 (ranibizumab) letters at 3 months (P = 0.43). The least-squares mean (SE) changes in CRT at 3 months from the baseline were -119.3 (12.0) µm and -124.5 (11.9) µm in the CKD-701 and ranibizumab groups, respectively (P = 0.74). The proportion of participants with subretinal or intraretinal fluid at 3, 6, and 12 months was similar between the study arms. The number (SE) of injections were 8.36 (3.13) in the CKD-701 and 8.26 (2.92) in ranibizumab (P = 0.62). The occurrence of adverse events and antidrug antibody in the study arms were also not statistically different. CONCLUSION: CKD-701 is a biosimilar to the reference ranibizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity for the treatment of patients with nAMD. Moreover, improvement and maintenance of visual outcome were achieved through PRN regimen.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Macular Degeneration , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Wet Macular Degeneration , Humans , Ranibizumab/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Intravitreal Injections , Visual Acuity , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Macular Degeneration/chemically induced , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy
7.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina ; 54(2): 78-83, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on trends in clinical presentation of acute, primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) from early to late phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study was a single-center, consecutive case series of 1,727 patients treated after vaccine availability ("late"; 3/29/21 to 9/26/21), corresponding time frame in previous year of pandemic ("early"; 3/30/20 to 9/27/20), and prior to pandemic ("pre"; 4/1/19 to 9/29/19). Primary outcome was proportion of patients presenting with macula-off RRD. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and primary proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). RESULTS: While macula-off RRD rates were significantly (P < 0.0001) elevated in early and late cohorts compared to the pre cohort, only the early cohort showed a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in both primary PVR presentation and complex RRD repair. Patients lost to follow-up in early cohort were significantly (P < 0.0001) higher than others. Early cohort showed significantly (P < 0.0001) worse final BCVA compared to others. CONCLUSION: Patients in late pandemic were less likely to exhibit clinical features of worse RRD disease and have improved visual outcomes compared to those in early pandemic. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:78-83.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Retinal Detachment , Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative , Humans , Retinal Detachment/diagnosis , Retinal Detachment/epidemiology , Retinal Detachment/surgery , Pandemics , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Vitrectomy/methods
8.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(2): 666-668, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2225956

ABSTRACT

We case of acute bilateral central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) after receiving the first dose of Covishield vaccine in a young, otherwise healthy male with no associated risk factors.


Subject(s)
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humans , Male , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Risk Factors , Visual Acuity
9.
Front Public Health ; 10: 1017479, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2199490

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To determine the association between poor visual acuity, the use of digital devices and physical activity (PA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 327,646 Chinese children and adolescents were included in the analysis using a cluster random sampling method; this is a case-control study, of those 144,708 children and adolescents with poor visual acuity were included in the case group, while 182,938 who did not have poor visual acuity were included in the control group. A logistic regression model was used to assess the contribution of PA and the use of digital devices to poor visual acuity. Results: A total of 144,708 children and adolescents experienced poor visual acuity during the COVID-19 pandemic; 54.8% were male, and 55.2% live in rural areas. Compared to controls, children and adolescents with poor visual acuity exhibited more time for the use of digital devices (4.51 ± 2.44 vs. 3.79 ± 2.34 for cases and controls, respectively; P < 0.001) and PA (3.07 ± 0.92 vs. 2.85 ± 1.00 for cases and controls, respectively; P < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, risk factors related to poor visual acuity among children and adolescents included the use of digital devices (OR 1.135; 95% CI 1.132-1.139), and PA (OR 1.269; 95%CI 1.259-1.278). The results of interaction analysis show that for children and adolescents aged 12 to 17, the positive association between the use of digital devices and poor visual acuity decreased. The interaction effect between PA and digital devices is 0.987. Conclusions: Children and adolescents were at risk of poor visual acuity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Extended use of the digital devices increased the risk of poor visual acuity, especially for children aged 6-11 years. But the risk of poor visual acuity among children and adolescents decreases as the time spent on PA increases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Case-Control Studies , Pandemics , Visual Acuity , Exercise
10.
Cornea ; 40(11): 1502-1504, 2021 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2063050

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The coronavirus disease 2019 global pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several ophthalmic manifestations have been reported to be associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, including conjunctivitis, acute sixth nerve palsy, and multiple cranial neuropathies. We present a unique case of unilateral phlyctenular keratoconjunctivitis in a 5-year-old boy in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Keratoconjunctivitis/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Administration, Oral , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Child, Preschool , Conjunctivitis, Viral/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Viral/virology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eye Infections, Viral/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Fluorometholone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Keratoconjunctivitis/drug therapy , Keratoconjunctivitis/virology , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Acuity/physiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
11.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 22(1): 391, 2022 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Visual acuity (VA) loss has been associated with depression in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, previous studies did not incorporate subgroups of AMD when correlating VA and mental health. The goal of this study was to describe the relationship between VA and mental health questions in patients with different classifications of AMD, and to identify associations of mental health subscale scores. METHODS: AMD patients classified by multi-modal imaging were recruited into an AMD registry. Habitual VA was obtained by ophthalmic technicians using the Snellen VA at distance. At enrollment, patients completed the NEI-VFQ-25, which includes 25 questions regarding the patient's visual functionality. Median with interquartile-range (IQR) scores on the mental health subscale of the VFQ were calculated by AMD classification and VA groups. Univariate and multivariable general linear models were used to estimate associations between mental health scores and variables of interest. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-five patients were included in the study. Patients with bilateral geographic atrophy (GA) or bilateral GA and neovascular (NV) AMD scored lowest on the mental health subscales with a median (IQR) of 58.2 (38-88) and 59.3 (38-88). When stratified by VA, patients with a habitual VA of 20/200 or worse scored the lowest on mental health subscales scores: median of 43.8 (IQR: 31-62). Patients with a VA of 20/20 scored the highest: 87.5 (IQR: 81-94). Habitual VA of the better- and worse-seeing eye and AMD classification were significantly associated with mental health subscale scores (all p < 0.0001 in both the univariate and multivariable analysis, except the VA of the worse-seeing eye in multivariable model p = 0.027). Patients enrolled during the COVID pandemic had mental health scores that were 2.7 points lower than prior to the pandemic, but this difference was not significant in univariate (p = 0.300) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.202). CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between mental health questionnaire scores and AMD classification, as well as VA in both the better and worse-seeing eyes in patients with AMD. It is important for clinicians to recognize feelings of worry/ frustration in these patients, so they can be appropriately referred, screened, and treated for mental health problems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Geographic Atrophy , Macular Degeneration , Humans , Macular Degeneration/psychology , Mental Health , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vision Disorders , Visual Acuity
12.
Eye (Lond) ; 36(10): 2057-2061, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2050363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ophthalmic disorders cause 8% of hospital clinic attendances, the highest of any specialty. The fundamental need for a distance visual acuity (VA) measurement constrains remote consultation. A web-application, DigiVis, facilitates self-assessment of VA using two internet-connected devices. This prospective validation study aimed to establish its accuracy, reliability, usability and acceptability. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In total, 120 patients aged 5-87 years (median = 27) self-tested their vision twice using DigiVis in addition to their standard clinical assessment. Eyes with VA worse than +0.80 logMAR were excluded. Accuracy and test-retest (TRT) variability were compared using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Patient feedback was analysed. RESULTS: Bias between VA tests was insignificant at -0.001 (95% CI -0.017 to 0.015) logMAR. The upper limit of agreement (LOA) was 0.173 (95% CI 0.146 to 0.201) and the lower LOA -0.175 (95% CI -0.202 to -0.147) logMAR. The ICC was 0.818 (95% CI 0.748 to 0.869). DigiVis TRT mean bias was similarly insignificant, at 0.001 (95% CI -0.011 to 0.013) logMAR, the upper LOA was 0.124 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.144) and the lower LOA -0.121 (95% CI -0.142 to -0.101) logMAR. The ICC was 0.922 (95% CI 0.887 to 0.946). 95% of subjects were willing to use DigiVis to monitor vision at home. CONCLUSIONS: Self-tested distance VA using DigiVis is accurate, reliable and well accepted by patients. The app has potential to facilitate home monitoring, triage and remote consultation but widescale implementation will require integration with NHS databases and secure patient data storage.


Subject(s)
Software , Vision Tests , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Vision, Ocular , Visual Acuity
13.
J Telemed Telecare ; 28(9): 670-679, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2020648

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has disrupted how ophthalmic practice is conducted worldwide. One patient population that may suffer from poor outcomes during the pandemic are those with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Many practices are performing some form of tele-ophthalmology services for their patients, and guidance is needed on how to maintain continuity of care amongst patients with AMD using tele-ophthalmology. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, ending 1 August 2020, to identify AMD outcomes and telecare management strategies that could be used during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: 237 total articles were retrieved, 56 of which were included for analysis. Four American Academy of Ophthalmology and Center for Disease Control web resources were also included. DISCUSSION: Risk-stratification models have been developed that let providers readily screen existing patients for their future risk of neovascular AMD (nAMD). When used with at-home monitoring devices to detect nAMD, providers may be able to determine who should be contacted via tele-ophthalmology for screening. Telemedicine triage can be used for new complaints of vision loss to determine who should be referred to a retinal specialist for management of suspected nAMD. To increase access and provider flexibility, smartphone fundus photography images sent to a centralized tele-ophthalmology service can aid in the detection of nAMD. Considerations should also be made for COVID-19 transmission, and tele-ophthalmology can be used to screen patients for the presence of COVID-19 prior to in-person office visits. Tele-ophthalmology has additional utility in connecting with nursing home, rural, and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in the post-pandemic period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Wet Macular Degeneration , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Ophthalmology/methods , Pandemics , Telemedicine/methods , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Visual Acuity
14.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(8)2022 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019950

ABSTRACT

A man in his 50s presented to the eye emergency department on three separate occasions complaining of blurred vision and discomfort in the left eye. He had a history of Marfan syndrome and had undergone bilateral 20-gauge (G) pars plana vitrectomy and lensectomy 20 years prior for ectopia lentis. On examination he had epithelial corneal oedema, raised intraocular pressure >40 mm Hg and conjunctival chemosis, which later appeared as a bleb-like conjunctival elevation. Acute treatment with oral acetazolamide and topical ocular hypotensive agents produced a marked reduction in intraocular pressure to 2-4 mm Hg. A presumed diagnosis of a leaking scleral wound was made. He underwent scleral exploration under general anaesthesia and a leaking sclerotomy was uncovered. The defect was repaired successfully using a scleral patch graft. Late dehiscence of a sclerotomy has been reported rarely in patients with Marfan syndrome. This is the first reported case to present atypically with intermittent episodes of raised intraocular pressure rather than with hypotony.


Subject(s)
Ectopia Lentis , Marfan Syndrome , Ectopia Lentis/surgery , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Marfan Syndrome/complications , Marfan Syndrome/diagnosis , Marfan Syndrome/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sclera/surgery , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy
15.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 241: 262-271, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2014767

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess safety of gene therapy in G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). DESIGN: Phase 1 clinical trial. METHODS: Setting: single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with G11778A LHON and chronic bilateral visual loss >12 months (group 1, n = 11), acute bilateral visual loss <12 months (group 2, n = 9), or unilateral visual loss (group 3, n = 8). INTERVENTION: unilateral intravitreal AAV2(Y444,500,730F)-P1ND4v2 injection with low, medium, high, and higher doses to worse eye for groups 1 and 2 and better eye for group 3. OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), adverse events, and vector antibody responses. Mean follow-up was 24 months (range, 12-36 months); BCVAs were compared with a published prospective natural history cohort with designated surrogate study and fellow eyes. RESULTS: Incident uveitis (8 of 28, 29%), the only vector-related adverse event, resulted in no attributable vision sequelae and was related to vector dose: 5 of 7 (71%) higher-dose eyes vs 3 of 21 (14%) low-, medium-, or high-dose eyes (P < .001). Incident uveitis requiring treatment was associated with increased serum AAV2 neutralizing antibody titers (p=0.007) but not serum AAV2 polymerase chain reaction. Improvements of ≥15-letter BCVA occurred in some treated and fellow eyes of groups 1 and 2 and some surrogate study and fellow eyes of natural history subjects. All study eyes (BCVA ≥20/40) in group 3 lost ≥15 letters within the first year despite treatment. CONCLUSIONS: G11778A LHON gene therapy has a favorable safety profile. Our results suggest that if there is an efficacy effect, it is likely small and not dose related. Demonstration of efficacy requires randomization of patients to a group not receiving vector in either eye.


Subject(s)
Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Dependovirus/genetics , Dependovirus/metabolism , Electroretinography , Genetic Therapy/adverse effects , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Vectors , Humans , NADH Dehydrogenase/genetics , NADH Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/therapy , Prospective Studies , Retinal Ganglion Cells , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Vision Disorders/etiology , Visual Acuity , Visual Fields
16.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 67(6): 1593-1602, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984091

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the regular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in patients with various retinal diseases globally. It is unclear to what extent delayed anti-VEGF injections have worsened patients' visual acuity. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of delayed anti-VEGF injections on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). We searched four computer databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus) from inception to January 5, 2022. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Results were reported by less than 4 months and 4 months or longer for the time period between the first injection during the pandemic and the last pre-pandemic injection. All BCVA measures were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analyses. Among patients who received injections 4 months or longer apart, the mean difference in BCVA was 0.10 logMAR (or 5 ETDRS letters) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06∼0.14) for nAMD patients, 0.01 logMAR (or∼ 1 ETDRS letter) (95% CI -0.25∼0.27) for RVO patients, and 0.03 logMAR (or ∼1 ETDRS letters) (95% CI -0.06∼0.11) for DME patients. These results suggest that patients with nAMD needing scheduled anti-VEGF injections may require priority treatment over those with RVO and DME in the event of disturbed anti-VEGF injections from COVID-19 lockdowns or similar scenarios.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Retinal Diseases , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Communicable Disease Control , Endothelial Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Pandemics , Ranibizumab/therapeutic use , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Visual Acuity
17.
J Diabetes Res ; 2022: 6620661, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1962494

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum L.) tablets as a complimentary herbal medication in diabetic macular edema. Methods: A total of 91 diabetic participants (117 eyes) with central involved macular edema underwent a double-blind randomized trial. The patients used garlic tablets (500 mg) (2 tab/day) or placebo for 4 weeks and subsequently were examined by an expert ophthalmologist. Clinical manifestations including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured as the main outcomes. Results: BCVA was significantly improved by a 0.18 decrease in mean logMAR value in the garlic-treated patients in comparison with 0.06 in the control ones (P value = 0.027). CMT was decreased in both groups by a 102.99 µm decrease in the garlic group compared to 52.67 µm in the placebo group, albeit in a nonsignificant manner (P value: 0.094). IOP was decreased in the garlic group by 1.03 mmHg (P value: 0.024) and increased by 0.3 mmHg (P value: 0.468) in the placebo group. Conclusion: Our trial suggests that garlic supplements can improve visual acuity, decrease the CMT and lower the IOP, and can be considered as an adjuvant treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema. Garlic was satisfactorily tolerated in diabetic patients, and no significant adverse effect interrupting the safety profile was observed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Garlic , Macular Edema , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Tablets/therapeutic use , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
18.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(8): 2493-2499, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1959037

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) are required to follow a treatment protocol that requires regular follow-ups. The COVID-19 pandemic has created an additional burden for patients with ARMD under treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, since patients face a congestion of the health system and closing of the outpatient services. This study examines the impact of the uncertainty regarding patients' treatment on their sense of well-being. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study of eighty patients who were followed during the year following the outbreak of the COVID pandemic. Patients reported their sense of well-being with the WHO-5 questionnaire and their perception and fears for the impact of the pandemic on their ongoing ARMD treatment. RESULTS: There was a significant drop in mental well-being during the pandemic that paralleled the self-reported impact of the pandemic on ARMD treatment. Patients who reported a higher impact of COVID-19 on their treatment had experienced a higher drop in mental wellbeing compared to those who hadn't, with female gender being an additional risk factor. Objective measurements of visual acuity did not factor in the drop of sense of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The high initial level of uncertainty regarding ARMD patients' long-term course was further exacerbated when exposed to additional uncertainties during the pandemic regarding their standard of care. Planning ahead for continuation of services and close contact with patients during similar health emergencies is of paramount importance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Macular Degeneration , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Longitudinal Studies , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Pandemics , Visual Acuity
19.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 513, 2022 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1915267

ABSTRACT

Loss of photoreceptors in atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) results in severe visual impairment. Since the low-resolution peripheral vision is retained in such conditions, restoration of central vision should not jeopardize the surrounding healthy retina and allow for simultaneous use of the natural and prosthetic sight. This interim report, prespecified in the study protocol, presents the first clinical results with a photovoltaic substitute of the photoreceptors providing simultaneous use of the central prosthetic and peripheral natural vision in atrophic AMD. In this open-label single group feasibility trial (NCT03333954, recruitment completed), five patients with geographic atrophy have been implanted with a wireless 2 x 2 mm-wide 30 µm-thick device, having 378 pixels of 100 µm in size. All 5 patients achieved the primary outcome of the study by demonstrating the prosthetic visual perception in the former scotoma. The four patients with a subretinal placement of the chip demonstrated the secondary outcome: Landolt acuity of 1.17 ± 0.13 pixels, corresponding to the Snellen range of 20/460-20/565. With electronic magnification of up to a factor of 8, patients demonstrated prosthetic acuity in the range of 20/63-20/98. Under room lighting conditions, patients could simultaneously use prosthetic central vision and their remaining peripheral vision in the implanted eye and in the fellow eye.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Geographic Atrophy/therapy , Macular Degeneration/therapy , Vision Disorders/therapy , Visual Perception , Visual Prosthesis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Electric Stimulation , Equipment Design , Eyeglasses , Humans , Retina , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
20.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 45(8): 852-859, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are the gold standard treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the cancellation of many scheduled intravitreal anti-VEGF injection visits. We compared the functional and structural visual outcomes of wet AMD patients who did not adhere to their planned intervals (group 1) with those who did (group 2). METHODS: Wet AMD patients of Swiss Visio Montchoisi and RétinElysée were included. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes between their first visit after the end of the first national lockdown in Switzerland (27 April 2020, first post-lockdown visit) and their last visit before the beginning of the first national lockdown in Switzerland (13 March 2020, last pre-lockdown visit) were assessed. The BCVA outcome was defined as unfavorable when there was a loss of≥5 ETDRS letters in the first post-lockdown visit compared to the BCVA at last pre-lockdown visit. The OCT outcome was defined as unfavorable when there was an increase in at least one of the parameters, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or pigment epithelial detachment (PED), at the first post-lockdown visit compared to the last pre-lockdown visit. MAIN RESULTS: Group 1 (89 patients, 109 eyes) had a 13.41% greater rate of unfavorable BCVA outcomes and a 38.27% greater rate of unfavorable OCT outcomes than group 2 (96 patients, 122 eyes) (P=0.04, P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the more the patients deviated from their programmed injections and the higher the BCVA pre-lockdown, the higher the rate of unfavorable BCVA outcomes (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively). OCT outcomes were not a predictive factor for an unfavorable BCVA outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The cancellation of many intravitreal anti-VEGF injection appointments resulted in worse functional and structural outcomes in wet AMD patients. The COVID-19 pandemic led many patients to refrain from their routine intravitreal anti-VEGF injection appointments, allowing us to analyze the role of designated intervals in the treatment of wet AMD. During any future lockdown due to COVID-19 or similar circumstances, continuity of care for wet AMD patients should be maintained.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Wet Macular Degeneration , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Communicable Disease Control , Endothelial Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Pandemics , Ranibizumab/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Visual Acuity , Wet Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Wet Macular Degeneration/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL